As the world embraces the advent of high powered intelligent works of the new age, more and more areas of labor have become less strenuous especially that people in the contemporary times are quite open-minded about these changes. Today, more than ever, jobs of most professionals are rather enjoyable not because of numerous benefits employees obtain, but the amount of time they save while doing their tasks of the day. What is more, many people nowadays are given enough time to do their hobbies and special pursuits.
However, along with such changes are crucial consequences by which customary practices must be altered. Whether they are linked to business or any other professions, practitioners are asked to do much more than what is required from them for if not, adverse effects on profitability and efficiency can be encountered. In the legal practice, many are wondering about the significance of electronic discovery statistics.
Electronic discovery market is never just any trend. This is a core of the protection law in the legal practice that encompasses acumen and expertise of different legal professionals including those concentrating on records management, forensics and information technology. Although it is essentially practiced in the United States and in many European countries, several other territories show relative interest about the implementation of such practice.
Litigation or regulatory proceedings necessitate proper predictive-coding system and technology-based document reviews. With the density of any legal tasks, the legal office simply needs to seek out high-speed processing software efficient enough in categorizing data and in executing apposite indexing.
Sophisticated technologies akin to this provide not only the utmost ease in calculating data gathered from previous to recent samples. These can deliver explicit results but users should be heedful of the process since there is a big possibility of getting unsuccessful outcome in an improper execution. Only through the effective use of such system that it can work well.
Attorneys should do their share in manually assessing data to ensure reliability and consistency. The review process could take long but results ought to be double checked no matter what. This software is created to provide reliable statistical results yet that does not necessarily mean lawyers will be excused from their duty.
Results obtained from manual review, however, are rather tested for consistency than sophisticated sampling produced by such software. Technology-assisted review is believed to yield precise results with lesser effort. Nonetheless, manual reviews are considered more effective albeit being strenuous and confounding.
Meanwhile, in regard to reliability, technology-assisted process remains an important subject for discussion though its cost-effectiveness has been remarkable. Human review process must be carried out not only once. Results need to be compared several times so as to ensure consistencies.
Moreover, knowing how important sampling familiarity is in obtaining correct results, it is best for legal professionals to consult experts of varied scientific phenomena and such technology. Experts can clearly show them exact sampling process and establish precise sample sizes. Also, they can ascertain confidence level on statistical inferences and point to standard formula in the process.
However, along with such changes are crucial consequences by which customary practices must be altered. Whether they are linked to business or any other professions, practitioners are asked to do much more than what is required from them for if not, adverse effects on profitability and efficiency can be encountered. In the legal practice, many are wondering about the significance of electronic discovery statistics.
Electronic discovery market is never just any trend. This is a core of the protection law in the legal practice that encompasses acumen and expertise of different legal professionals including those concentrating on records management, forensics and information technology. Although it is essentially practiced in the United States and in many European countries, several other territories show relative interest about the implementation of such practice.
Litigation or regulatory proceedings necessitate proper predictive-coding system and technology-based document reviews. With the density of any legal tasks, the legal office simply needs to seek out high-speed processing software efficient enough in categorizing data and in executing apposite indexing.
Sophisticated technologies akin to this provide not only the utmost ease in calculating data gathered from previous to recent samples. These can deliver explicit results but users should be heedful of the process since there is a big possibility of getting unsuccessful outcome in an improper execution. Only through the effective use of such system that it can work well.
Attorneys should do their share in manually assessing data to ensure reliability and consistency. The review process could take long but results ought to be double checked no matter what. This software is created to provide reliable statistical results yet that does not necessarily mean lawyers will be excused from their duty.
Results obtained from manual review, however, are rather tested for consistency than sophisticated sampling produced by such software. Technology-assisted review is believed to yield precise results with lesser effort. Nonetheless, manual reviews are considered more effective albeit being strenuous and confounding.
Meanwhile, in regard to reliability, technology-assisted process remains an important subject for discussion though its cost-effectiveness has been remarkable. Human review process must be carried out not only once. Results need to be compared several times so as to ensure consistencies.
Moreover, knowing how important sampling familiarity is in obtaining correct results, it is best for legal professionals to consult experts of varied scientific phenomena and such technology. Experts can clearly show them exact sampling process and establish precise sample sizes. Also, they can ascertain confidence level on statistical inferences and point to standard formula in the process.
About the Author:
The following website features up-to-date electronic discovery statistics for all your needs. For further info, you are welcome to check out our web pages now at http://www.statisticsforlawyers.com.
0 comments:
Post a Comment